Saturday, November 17, 2007

Good but not good enough - Climate change department faces £300m cuts

Shame there can't be more of this kind of thing, presented by the Grauniad as bad news whereas in fact if it does happen would be very good news. This backward, anti-human enviro-mentalist rubbish, a dangerous craze lapped up by the credulous and shamefully promoted by cynical politicians, is in urgent need of the hacksaw treatment. Governments should stop subsidising the bloated enviro-mentalist grievance industry, cease their efforts at brainwashing children by sending schools free copies of Al Gore's film and crucially the news media should stop promoting this noxious creed.

10 Comments:

Anonymous WorldbyStom said...

Surely a freedom of speech issue here, if nowt else?

11/18/2007 2:53 PM  
Blogger Patriccus said...

Er...why?

11/22/2007 12:53 AM  
Anonymous Kevin Boatang said...

Maria you stupid fucking bitch, what is it you don't get in life? Peter Hitchens is a ranter, someone who crashes from one topic no one gives a shit about to another, making sweeping statements about how left wing everyone is and how the world is doomed.
You're blindingly stupid aren't you? Notice the question mark there? I don't want to be a writer or anything of the kind, so no, it doesn't rankle at all. Can I point out, once again, that you a so fucking thick it hurts. Why? Here's why numbnuts:
A rhetorical question has a fucking question mark at the end you dumb prick. That's why it's called a rehtorical question. What you have said is a statement, so fuck off, get a life, and suck Hitchens cock the next time you see him because you are clearly in love with the man.
Oh, and your blog is pile of shit! Red Maria who thinks Htich is a ledge and spends her life writing about the fucking Respect party. That party no one gives a shit about. My writing? We do 1500 words pieces at a time sweetheart, not the paragraph bollocks you dump on the world.

11/26/2007 5:59 AM  
Blogger Patriccus said...

Peter Hitchens may be a ranter, but at least he can spell. You write 1,500 word long articles do you Kevin? At your current rate of typos it must resemble a shopping list written in Welsh.

Having begun reading the tired and turgid crap which you shrilly pipe up with on the blogs of superior thinkers and writers, I can only assume that are demonstrating your abilities of pharmaceutical alchemy by falling on the cure for insomnia.

Either that, or Daddy really didn’t listen to you as a child, did he? Well guess what – neither is anyone else.

11/30/2007 6:03 AM  
Anonymous Kevin Boatang said...

Patty. Fuck off love okay? I've also checked out your shitty little site and found it to be as sad and crap as this, the Oxford Union shouldn't be allowed to do what it wants and your amazing views on football. Well fantastic, thank God for that, another sad lonely lefty talking rubbish. What a turn up for the books.
Typos. Bothered. It's called being busy and not having time to spend an afternoon writing a paragraph about Respect and then re-reading twenty times. A job? A life? Nah, you just sit in your room having a tug, writing shit and getting your mummy to bring you biscuits.
Daddy not listening? What? You have a blog, we have a blog, what the fuck is the problem with you? Do you really think that anything anyone writes on a blog makes any impact at all. If you do then you need to get out more. Except you can't.
Oh yeah, fuck Chen.

12/03/2007 5:41 AM  
Blogger Red Maria said...

Oh my gawd, you really *are* thick, aren't you. And you have pretensions to being a hack. Give it up. You'll never make it.

12/04/2007 9:56 AM  
Blogger Patriccus said...

Ah, the return of Mr. Average in the form of Kevin Boateng. As amused as I am by the “So there!” nature of your above piece (a style not dissimilar from your entire blog, I note), I thought I’d offer a few words of “comradely” advice. From one leftist to another, shall we say.

Firstly, opening with a “leave me alone” plea and then moving in the same breath to “you’re shit” insults leaves you open less to charges of hypocrisy than simple whining of “he hit me first”. Either way, it has left several people doubled over at your pre-pubescent snivelling. Similarly, your breathless assurances of being busy (bi-weekly lectures, I assume?) do not appear to fit comfortably with the ongoing quantity of bile you determinedly load on the blogs of others. If however you seek to offer criticism on the topics covered by other writers, do try not to follow this up with a piece of your own on Dungeons and Dragons of all things. Seriously, the laughter at the thought of you in your cum-stained Marilyn Mason T-shirt (look down) and indignantly unleashing the full heat of your opinions onto the world is beginning to reach crescendo.

Clearly, Maria has given you too much credit in referring to your deluded pretensions to being a hack since you are clearly well short of the writing talents of the average Media Studies undergrad. Any comments on the future of such an intellectual peewee would be a waste of warm air. Maybe I’ll see you one day serving in McDonalds, but until then just keep on squeezing those spots and dressing up in Mummy’s clothes, and the full power of grammar will hit you one day.

12/05/2007 9:10 AM  
Blogger voltaires said...

You've obviously upset Mr Boatang haven't you my dear? Although comment box ranting is always tremendously amusing in and of itself, I do feel obliged just to mention that you're talking shite about global warming. Although I'm not as angry as Kevin seems to be, for whatever reason, I hasten to add.

12/09/2007 8:07 AM  
Blogger Red Maria said...

Oh Mr Boatang - he's just a chief.
Still, while we're on the subject, Veep, comment box ranting seems to be *the* subject de nos jours on certain leftie blogs at the moment :-)
Whether it is to be allowed or not? What is says about us and them? Whether prolonged and excessive ranting is indicative of some deeper problem? And should the out-of-control ranter be silenced for his own good?
I cannot pretend to know the answers to such questions, so others will have to wrestle with these dilemmas themselves.
Which brings me neatly to les frères Hitchens. They are distinguished by their personal commitment to free speech. That is to say, rather than merely assume fashionable postures about enlightenment values or the superiority of Western civilisation, they practice what they preach and will argue back with their opponents, both of them.
I think Hitchens senior would regard some of the fiestas of foul mouthed bile and censorship in place of debate among those who make no secret of their hero worship for him with grand contempt, possibly declaring that if this is Hitchensism, he is no Hitchensist.

12/09/2007 9:26 AM  
Blogger voltaires said...

I'm given to agree, especially on the latter point ;-)

12/09/2007 11:59 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home