(Naughty) Thought for the Day: Just because Dorries says it doesn't necessarily mean that it's wrong
That leave be given to bring in a Bill to require schools to provide certain additional sex education to girls aged between 13 and 16; to provide that such education must include information and advice on the benefits of abstinence from sexual activity; and for connected purposes.
The shock, the horror!
Then an underwear model gets up and holds forth on the benefits of sex'n'relationships education.
The shock, the horror!
Then an underwear model gets up and holds forth on the benefits of sex'n'relationships education.


5 Comments:
(here via your comments to Roz on Twitter)
Never understood people who think girls should be told not to have sex. Are they advocating mutual boy/boy sex (nothing wrong with that, of course) ... or rape?
Nadine's bill was such a basic part of rape culture (if a nice girl says no, she means yes: if she says yes, she's not a nice girl) that it surprises me to find anyone but a handful of anti-women MPs agreeing with it.
Hi Yonmei,
No offence but don't you think the sentiments in your final paragraph are sheer hysteria?
Has either the Good Archbishop or the Magic Circle opined on this?
Are you going to post on the Guild?
Have you heard about the World Exclusive interview with Pushkin, the Birmingham Oratory Cat who met the Pope? Pushkin tells us exclusively about his life, his loves and his opinions on world affairs:
http://catholicheritage.blogspot.com/2011/07/pushkin-oratory-cat-who-met-pope.html
Please tell all your readers about the World Exclusive Interview that we are proud to include in our journal:
http://catholicheritage.blogspot.com/2011/07/christvs-regnat-july-2011.html
It can be downloaded here:
http://www.lulu.com/product/paperback/christvs-regnat-volume-5-number-1-july-2011/16340963
We'd also love if you can ask all your readers to come and follow our blog:
http://www.catholicheritage.com
And if you can post up a link to our blog on your own.
Post a Comment
<< Home